Travel in Time with Dan — Episode 66: A Fictional Interview with Benedict Arnold at the Battle of Bemis Heights

Travel in Time with Dan | Saratoga, New York — October 7, 1777

⚠️ Author’s Note: The following is a fictional historical interview. Benedict Arnold (1741–1801) was a real American general whose military career produced some of the most extraordinary acts of battlefield heroism in the Revolutionary War… and whose name became, in the end, synonymous with betrayal. At the Battle of Saratoga, Arnold played a critical role in both engagements… Freeman’s Farm in September and Bemis Heights in October 1777. At Bemis Heights, General Horatio Gates had relieved Arnold of command following a bitter personal dispute. Arnold rode into battle anyway… without orders, without authority, against the explicit wishes of his commanding officer… leading charges that broke the British line and directly forced General John Burgoyne’s eventual surrender. During the assault on a Hessian redoubt, Arnold was shot in the same leg that had been wounded in Canada. He was carried from the field. The surgeon who treated him reportedly said that it was a pity the bullet had not struck higher, toward his heart — a comment that history would come to find darkly prophetic. Burgoyne surrendered on October 17, 1777. The American victory at Saratoga convinced France to enter the war as an American ally, transforming a colonial rebellion into a global conflict and making American independence a genuine possibility. Benedict Arnold’s contributions to that victory were real, enormous, and almost entirely unacknowledged by the Congress and commanders whose politics he had spent years fighting. His subsequent treason… the attempted surrender of West Point to the British in 1780… remains one of the most studied acts of betrayal in American military history. This imagined conversation takes place on the field at Bemis Heights, in the immediate aftermath of Arnold’s wounding, before he is carried from the field and before history has rendered its final verdict on the man. The historical facts are real. The dialogue is creative fiction, written with an honest attempt to hold both things about Benedict Arnold simultaneously… the hero he was and the traitor he became… without pretending either one cancels the other out.

📍 Setting: The field at Bemis Heights, Saratoga, New York — October 7, 1777. Late afternoon. The sound of the battle is still present at the edges… musket fire, shouting, the particular controlled chaos of an engagement that has turned decisively in one direction. Near a redoubt that was, an hour ago, in British hands and is now not, a man is on the ground with his back against the earthworks, one leg at an angle that makes it immediately clear something is badly wrong. He is not unconscious. He is, in fact, entirely alert. His eyes bright with the particular intensity of a man who has just done something extraordinary and is running on whatever fuel the body produces in those moments before the pain fully arrives. His coat is torn. There is blood. Around him, men are moving with the focused urgency of soldiers who have just won something significant and are not yet sure how significant. A surgeon is being sent for. Arnold looks up as I approach, and his expression is complicated in a way that is difficult to read at first. It’s somewhere between triumph and something darker that has not yet resolved itself into anything nameable.

Arnold: (Before I can speak, with the hoarse energy of a man whose voice has been giving orders for hours)

The redoubt is taken. Tell me you saw it. I want someone besides these men to know what just happened on this field.

Dan: I saw it. You rode through your own lines after Gates relieved you of command. You had no authority to be here.

Arnold: (A short, fierce sound that might be a laugh if it weren’t for the leg)

No authority. No, that’s right. Gates made certain of that this morning. Very thorough about it. Wrote it down and everything. (A pause, the brightness in his eyes shifting slightly) And yet here we are, and the redoubt is taken, and Burgoyne’s line is broken, and someone who was not supposed to be on this field apparently made the difference between a battle that stalled and a battle that won. So I will leave the question of authority to the historians and the politicians, who I have found are considerably more comfortable with it than I am.

Dan: You were shot. How bad is it?

Arnold: (Looking down at the leg with the detached assessment of a man who has been wounded before and knows how to read it)

Bad enough. The same leg as Canada, which suggests either very bad luck or very consistent aim on the part of the British, I’m not yet sure which. (A grimace that he controls quickly) The surgeon will tell me what it means. Right now it means I am having this conversation from the ground instead of from a horse, which is not my preferred position for conversations.

Dan: Let me ask you the question that everyone in that command tent is going to be asking tomorrow. Gates relieved you. You rode out anyway. Was that the right thing to do?

Arnold: (Without hesitation, then immediately more complicated)

Yes. And also — it depends on what you mean by right.

(He shifts, carefully, against the earthwork)

The right thing for this battle, on this afternoon, with the men who needed someone to follow a charge through that gap in the British line — yes. Completely and without qualification. The men were stalled. The moment was there and it was closing. I knew it and Gates, from wherever he was sitting, did not know it or did not act on it, and in battle the moment does not wait for the man with the proper paperwork. So I rode. And the redoubt fell. And Burgoyne’s position is now untenable. That is the military calculation and it is correct.

(A pause)

The other right… the institutional right, the question of whether a general should ride into battle against the direct orders of his commanding officer… that is a harder question and I will not pretend it isn’t. If every officer did what I did today whenever he disagreed with his commander, you would not have an army. You would have a collection of very opinionated men on horses. The chain of command exists for reasons that are genuinely good reasons, and I know that.

(Quietly)

I just know also that if I had stayed in the tent, this battle would have ended differently. And I was not able to make myself stay in the tent.

Dan: The dispute with Gates… what is it actually about?

Arnold: (The brightness shifting again, something harder entering his expression)

Glory. Credit. Which name goes on the dispatch to Congress. Gates will write the report of this battle and his name will be prominent in it and mine will be… (he stops, controls something)… less prominent. That is how these things work. I have watched it work that way for three years. A man does the work, takes the wound, breaks the line, and someone else writes the letter to Philadelphia and receives the promotion.

(Looking at me directly)

I do not say this to sound aggrieved. I say it because it is true, and pretending it isn’t true serves no one. Congress has passed me over for promotion. Officers junior to me have been elevated above me. I have resigned and been talked back. I have come to this field today as a man without a command, acting on his own judgment, and I have won something that will help win this war. And tomorrow, Gates will write the dispatch.

Dan: Does that bitterness worry you?

Arnold: (A long pause… the longest of the conversation)

(Something moving across his face that is difficult to name precisely. It’s not quite recognition, not quite warning, but something in that territory)

What worries me is that I can feel it getting heavier. The bitterness. Each time it happens… each promotion denied, each slight, each letter to Congress that leaves out what I actually did… it gets heavier, and I can feel it changing the way I see things. The way I see the cause. The way I see the men who are supposed to be on my side.

(Quietly, and with an honesty that seems to surprise even him)

A man who starts a war fighting for a principle and ends it fighting for recognition has lost something along the way. I know that. I am not certain I know how to stop it.

Dan: What was the principle? When you started. What were you fighting for?

Arnold: (Without hesitation, and with a genuineness that is entirely unguarded)

Freedom. The actual thing, not the word. The idea that a man should not be governed by people who have no stake in his life and no knowledge of his circumstances. I believed that completely. I still believe it. (A beat) Everything else that has happened since… the politics, the slights, the promotions, the investigations into my conduct, the men who have benefited from my work and then looked past me… none of that changes what I believed when I first took up arms.

The difficulty is that believing in a principle does not protect you from what happens to you while you are fighting for it. And what happens to you accumulates.

Dan: Let’s talk about what this battle means — beyond your personal situation. Burgoyne is going to surrender. What does that actually do to this war?

Arnold: (The shift back to the military man is immediate and complete. This is clearly the ground where he is most comfortable)

It changes everything. Not just the campaign… everything. A colonial army defeating a British army in the field, decisively, with Burgoyne’s entire force taken… that is not a skirmish or a raid or a lucky engagement. That is proof. Proof that this army can fight and win against the best military force in the world.

And proof travels. It travels to Paris, where Franklin has been making arguments that will now be considerably easier to make. France does not ally itself with lost causes. France allies itself with causes that can win. After today, after the surrender that is coming, we are a cause that can win. The French will come in. Then the Spanish. Then the Dutch. What England thinks it is doing… suppressing a colonial rebellion… it is about to discover is something considerably larger.

(With a quiet intensity)

The men who fought here today… the militia who kept arriving, the farmers and tradesmen who came because they heard something important was happening and decided it was worth their lives… they did not know they were changing the world. They came because it was the right battle at the right moment and they were close enough to reach it. That is what armies of free men can do that professional armies cannot always do. They choose to be here. And that choice, made by enough people at the right moment, is worth more than any tactical plan Burgoyne ever drew.

Dan: Last question, General Arnold. People will stand near this field for centuries, trying to understand what happened here and who you were. What do you want them to know?

Arnold: (A very long silence, the field sounds fading around us, the surgeon’s men visible now in the distance)

I want them to know that what happened on this field today was real. That the men who rode and charged and bled here were real, and that the outcome was not inevitable, and that it required people willing to act at the moment when acting was necessary regardless of what the paperwork said.

(A pause, and something shifting in his expression… a weight that seems, in this moment, to belong to more than just the wounded leg)

And I want them to know… (he stops, starts again)… I want them to sit with the question of what a man owes to a cause he has given everything for, and what he is owed in return, and what happens when that account feels permanently unbalanced. Not because I have an answer. I do not have an answer today. But it is a question worth sitting with honestly, because it does not only apply to generals in 1777. It applies to anyone who has ever given more than they received and felt the weight of that accumulating.

(Looking down at the leg one more time, then back up)

I rode onto this field without orders because I could not make myself stay in the tent while the moment was closing. I do not regret it. Whatever comes after this… (a pause that seems to reach further than the afternoon)… I do not regret this.

They carried Benedict Arnold from the field at Bemis Heights on October 7, 1777. The leg would heal badly and leave him with a permanent limp. Burgoyne surrendered ten days later. The French alliance followed in 1778. The war that had been a colonial rebellion became a global conflict, and eventually became an American victory.

Arnold’s name does not appear in Gates’s dispatch. His contributions to Saratoga were real and enormous and largely unacknowledged by the men and institutions he had bled for. The bitterness he named on that field… the weight he could feel getting heavier… did not lift. It grew.

In 1780, Benedict Arnold attempted to surrender West Point to the British. The plot was discovered. He fled to the British lines. He spent the rest of his life in exile, first in Britain, then in Canada, remembered in America only for what he became and almost never for what he was.

At the Saratoga battlefield today, there is a monument to the American generals who fought there. It has four niches. Three contain statues. The fourth niche… the one reserved for the general whose contribution to the battle may have been the most decisive of all… is empty. There is only a boot, carved in stone, representing the leg that was wounded on this field.

No name. Just the boot.

The leadership lesson lives in both halves of Benedict Arnold, and it takes both halves to complete it. The first half: in the moment that matters, true leaders act… without orders, without authority, without the guarantee that anyone will credit them for it. Arnold rode onto that field because the battle needed him and he could not make himself stay in the tent. That is genuine leadership, and it helped win the turning point of the American Revolution.

The second half is harder: what accumulates in a person who gives everything and receives nothing… the bitterness, the sense of unbalanced accounts, the weight getting heavier… is not a small thing, and it does not resolve itself on its own. Arnold named it on that field before he fully understood where it would take him. A leader who cannot find a way to carry that weight without letting it corrupt the principle he started with will eventually find that the weight has become heavier than the principle.

He was right about what he did at Bemis Heights. He was right about what was owed to him. He was wrong about what to do about it.

The boot is still there. The niche is still empty.

Some lessons come at a very high cost. ⚔️🏛️

Travel in Time with Dan is where travel, history, and leadership come together. Uncovering History. Inspiring Leadership.

📺 Watch the episode: YouTube | 🎙️ Listen to the podcast: Spotify | 📖 Read the blog: granddaddyssecrets.com | 📚 Dan’s book: Travel in Time in the Northeast

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *